• Welcome to my blog.
    Here is some more information about me and here is my blog’s official disclaimer.



    Follow me on Twitter ...

    @manpowerblawg
  • The Employment Law Sing-A-Long Song
    The Employment Law Sing-A-Long Song
    Views: 8,744
    How to Hire If You Want to Get Fired
    How to Hire If You Want to Get Fired
    Views: 5,498
    Up Close and Personnel Tour
    Caffeinated Conversations
  • If you could change one thing about attorneys, what would it be?


    View Results

The Office: Weekly Analysis and Contest

In my humble opinion, NBC’s The Office is the world’s #1 employment law training aid. All you have to do is (1) watch it and (2) do the exact opposite of everything you see.

To help enhance your viewing experience, each week I provide a critique of the action from an employment lawyer’s perspective.

Last Night’s Episode: “The Promotion.”

The Plot: The company’s ill-advised decision to name Jim Co-manager along with Michael leads to predictably disastrous results.

My Analysis:

  1. Issue: Bad Promotion Process/Decision
    Description: The company’s lack of process in promoting Jim (and demoting Michael) could subject it to discrimination claims from Michael, Dwight and others. In addition, having two people (especially people like Michael and Jim) share leadership of a team without clearly articulated roles is a recipe for disaster (as virtually every moment of the episode graphically illustrated).
    Risk: $$$$$
  2. Issue: Rampant Insubordination
    Description: Several employees were allowed to engage in blatant and repeated insubordination against Jim in his new role. Dwight called him “idiot,” Kelly called him “jerk” and many others joined in with even less flattering comments. Dwight brought the insubordination to a head by attempting to lead a coup (see “Workplace Violence,” below). The company did nothing to address the unacceptable behavior.
    Risk: $$$
  3. Issue: Complaint Process
    Description: The company mishandled Dwight’s complaint about Jim by having Jim (the alleged wrongdoer) “investigate” it.
    Risk: $$$
  4. Issue: Workplace Violence
    Description: Enraged by the promotion decision, Dwight made several rather creative threats to do Jim bodily harm. Combined with Dwight’s plethora of previous threats and acts, the company’s failure to discipline Dwight could expose it to serious liability — especially if he actually harms Jim.
    Risk: $$$$$$
  5. Issue: Perceived Disability
    Description: Michael made several comments that could lead to perceived disability claims (about Jim being “insane” for thinking that his office was a conference room, along with comments about various skin conditions, including Jim’s allegedly over-sized nose pores).
    Risk: $$$
  6. Issue: Bad Raise Process/Decision
    Description: Jim’s and Michael’s attempts to decide which employees were worthy of raises could lead to lawsuits from almost any of them. Rather than consulting with HR, they tried various approaches, including (1) rewarding only one class of employees (salespeople, including Jim’s fiancee, Pam) and then (2) voting for their favorite employees by placing beans on photos of their faces. The poorly executed communication of the decisions further damaged employee morale, nearly leading to an all-out revolt.
    Risk: $$$$
  7. Issue: Nepotism
    Description: Allowing Jim to manage his fiancee no doubt violates company policy and exposes the company to claims of favoritism and discrimination.
    Risk: $$
  8. Issue: Intoxication
    Description: Rather than facing their problems head-on, Michael and Jim hide in Jim’s office and drank gin.
    Risk: $$
  9. Issue: Gambling
    Description: Ryan solicited money from Pam to gamble on college basketball games using his “foolproof” algorithm.
    Risk: $$
  10. Issue: Inappropriate Comments
    Description: Once again, virtually every employee made an inappropriate remark. The primary culprits this week were Michael (analogizing toilet paper to planets), Meredith (comment about a possible past fling with Creed), Dwight (comment about Phyllis being “matronly”) and many, many others. At this point, everyone could sue the company and everyone else.
    Risk: $$$$

OFFICIAL “ARE YOU SMARTER THAN A LAWYER?” CONTEST: Anyone who leaves a comment below or sends an e-mail to blawg@manpower.com identifying an employment law issue that I missed will win a valuable prize. If you didn’t get a chance to see the episode, you can view it on NBC’s official web site here.

As always, thanks for your participation!

Comments

One Response to “The Office: Weekly Analysis and Contest”

  1. Mark Toth Says:

    Experienced some slight technological difficulties in posting this. If you see anything strange, just refresh your browser and everything should be OK. Sorry for any inconvenience!

Leave a Reply