<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Office: Weekly Analysis &amp; Contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2009/11/06/the-office-weekly-analysis-contest-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2009/11/06/the-office-weekly-analysis-contest-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:15:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Toth</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2009/11/06/the-office-weekly-analysis-contest-3/comment-page-1/#comment-37745</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Toth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/?p=3945#comment-37745</guid>
		<description>Nice catch, Aaron. Should have included that. I&#039;ll update the post and add that. For your efforts, we&#039;ll send you a valuable prize. Thanks for your participation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catch, Aaron. Should have included that. I&#8217;ll update the post and add that. For your efforts, we&#8217;ll send you a valuable prize. Thanks for your participation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Ziff</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2009/11/06/the-office-weekly-analysis-contest-3/comment-page-1/#comment-37744</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Ziff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/?p=3945#comment-37744</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Toby also implicitly endorse the fight as long as it was &quot;held off of company property&quot;?  That seems like it wouold preclude a plausible deniability statement by the company later, exposing them to a lawsuit.  Also, the fight was held in the parking lot of the office building- is this considered &quot;off premises&quot;?

Your analysis was admittedly pretty thorough, Mark.  What a great job you have- watch The Office and transcribe HR policy violations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Toby also implicitly endorse the fight as long as it was &#8220;held off of company property&#8221;?  That seems like it wouold preclude a plausible deniability statement by the company later, exposing them to a lawsuit.  Also, the fight was held in the parking lot of the office building- is this considered &#8220;off premises&#8221;?</p>
<p>Your analysis was admittedly pretty thorough, Mark.  What a great job you have- watch The Office and transcribe HR policy violations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Government Recruitment</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2009/11/06/the-office-weekly-analysis-contest-3/comment-page-1/#comment-37584</link>
		<dc:creator>Government Recruitment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/?p=3945#comment-37584</guid>
		<description>hi.. i thing you made a great post in that article because no everyone knows about that, but now they know that value of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi.. i thing you made a great post in that article because no everyone knows about that, but now they know that value of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
