In my humble opinion, NBC’s The Office is the world’s #1 employment law training aid. All you have to do is (1) watch it and (2) do the exact opposite of everything you see.
To help enhance your viewing experience, each week I provide a critique of the action from an employment lawyer’s perspective.
Last Night’s Episode: “Scott’s Tots.”
The Plot: Here’s NBC’s official description: “”Michael must face the music after he realizes he can’t keep a promise he made to a group of kids ten years ago.”
My Analysis:
- Issue: Criminally Bad Impersonations/Identity Theft
Description: There were lots of bad impersonations this week. Michael did a bad Elvis impersonation. Andy did a bad baby impersonation. On a more serious note, Dwight impersonated Kevin, Stanley and Toby in attempting to get Jim fired (see below).
Risk: $$
- Issue: Breach of Contract
Description: Ten years ago, Michael promised several youngsters that he would pay their college tuition if they graduated from high school. Now that it’s almost time to pay up, he’s reneging. He could be facing a $1+ million breach of contract/negligent misrepresentation suit. The company could potentially get ensnared as well if the plaintiffs claim that Michael was acting within the scope of his employment when he made the promise. Michael’s likely defense — that the kids stayed in school and thereby benefited from his ill-advised promise — probably won’t carry the day. Also, his attempt to mitigate damages by giving the kids laptop batteries is unlikely to sway any judge or jury.
Risk: $$$$$
- Issue: Theft of Company Time
Description: For approximately the 87th consecutive week, no one in the office did any discernible work of any kind. Erin was forced to accompany Michael at a non-work event on company time. Everyone else spent most of their time fighting over who should be employee of the month.
Risk: $$$
- Issue: Perceived Disability
Description: Coupled with statements made in previous weeks, Andy’s observation that some of his co-workers were suffering from a “critical case of the Mondays” could potentially result in perceived disability claims by various employees.
Risk: $$
- Issue: Nepotism
Description: Jim’s recognition of Pam (his wife) as “employee of the month” fueled the fire of nepotism claims by other employees.
Risk: $$$
- Issue: Computer Porn
Description: Michael (basically) admitted in public that he has porn on his computer. He ordered Erin — a female subordinate — to remove it. Michael’s co-manager, Jim, witnessed the incident. If the company takes no action against Michael, it will be difficult to discipline others for future violations of the policy.
Risk: $$$
- Issue: Conspiracy/Fraud
Description: Dwight spent the episode implementing a “diabolical plan” to get Jim fired. Along the way, he lied to several employees, abused company processes, convinced his co-workers to give him hundreds of dollars under false pretenses and then attempted to mislead the company’s CFO. Not surprisingly, all of Dwight’s efforts were unsuccessful. At the end of the episode, Ryan — already a convicted felon due to his prior fraudulent acts at DM – agreed to conspire with Dwight in future anti-Jim efforts. The company should fire Dwight and Ryan right now.
Risk: $$$
- Issue: Faulty Background Checks
Description: The company’s hiring process failed to detect that every place Andy worked previously — Enron, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers – all collapsed. Now Dunder Mifflin is teetering on the edge of bankruptcy? Coincidence?
Risk: $$
- Issue: Various Other Inappropriate Comments/Actions
Description: Once again, virtually every employee said or did something inappropriate. At this point, virtually every employee could sue the company for something and win.
Risk: $$$$$$$
OFFICIAL “ARE YOU SMARTER THAN A LAWYER?” CONTEST: Anyone who leaves a comment below identifying an employment law issue that I missed will win a valuable prize. If you didn’t get a chance to see the episode, you can view it on NBC’s official web site here.
As always, thanks for your participation!